Thursday, August 13, 2009

Music Taxes Will Kill Music Innovation


Forcing people to buy music whether they want to or not is not a solution to this problem. The incentives created by such a system are perverse - guaranteed revenue and guaranteed profits will remove any incentive to innovate and serve niche markets. It will be the death of music.
Music industry revenues will be a set size, regardless of the quality or type of music they release. Incentives to innovate will evaporate. There will only be competition for market share, with no attempt to build the size of market or serve less-popular niches. Forget labels building new brands and encouraging early artists to succeed - they’ll bleed existing big names for all they are worth and work hard to keep anything new - labels, artists, and songwriters - out of the market. New entrants just means more competition for a static amount of money. Collusion by existing players will run rampant. Soon labels will complain that revenues aren’t high enough to sustain their businesses, and demand a higher tax. It will go up, but it will never go down.Asking the government to prop up a dying industry is always (always) a bad idea. In this case, it is a monumentally stupid, dangerous, and bad idea.
Works Cited: Arrington, Michael. "The Music Industry's Last Stand Will Be A Music Tax." www. techcrunch.com. 10 Jan. 2008. 12 Aug. 2009<http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/01/10/the-music-industrys-last-stand-will-be-a-music-tax/>

1 comment:

  1. I agree completely with the point of the post. A music tax would certainly stifle excellence and creativity to a point. On the other hand, the damage of ‘free music’ is done. It’s too late to turn back now. Technology has impacted tons of industries, why should the music industry receive subsidy in the form of tax revenues? Recording artists have to hit the road and tour since live performance is where the big bucks are too made.

    ReplyDelete